Thursday, November 20, 2008

$6B and no improvement on reading comprehension

We often hear that we must spend more money on education.  I would like to see us spend money wisely first because study after study shows that more money is not the answer.  Here is just one example.

 

No Effect on Comprehension Seen From 'Reading First'

Education Week 11/20/2008

The $6 billion funding for the federal Reading First program has not had an impact on reading comprehension among 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graders in participating schools, according to one of the largest and most rigorous studies ever undertaken by the U.S. Department of Education…reading achievement was low, with fewer than half of 1st graders, and fewer than 40 percent of 2nd and 3rd graders showing grade-level proficiency in their understanding of what they read.

https://remoteaccess.csw.l-3com.com/ew/articles/2008/11/18/,DanaInfo=www.edweek.org+14read.h28.html?tmp=123707670

 

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

New Utah State School Board

Like it or not it is time for a new Utah State School Board.  Of the fifteen board seats seven were up for re-election this year.  Of those seven only Janet Cannon will be returning. The following six will be new board members:

District 1 - Locke, Shelly

District 4 – Thomas, Dave

District 7 - Castle, Leslie Brooks

District 11 - Crandall, Dave

District 12 - Murphy, Carol A

District 13 - Bateman, Kyle

I am extremely disappointed that Mark Cluff is not returning.  Mark has been a great advocate for our children.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Education Research Links

• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES): nces.ed.gov
• National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST): www.cse.ucla.edu
• National School Boards Association (NSBA): www.nsba.org
• National School Public Relations Association (NSPRA): www.nspra.org
• National Study of School Evaluation (NSSE): www.nsse.org
• North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL): www.ncrel.org
• Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA): www.nwea.org
• Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NWREL): www.nwrel.org
• Quality Leadership by Design (QLD): www.quantumlearningdynamic.com
• School Improvement in Maryland: www.mdk12.org
• Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL): www.sedl.org
• Tools for School-Improvement Planning: http://annenberginstitute.org/tools/
• U.S. Department of Education: www.ed.gov
• WestEd: www.wested.org

A Parent's Guide to Education Reform

The Heritage Foundation has published A Parent’s Guide to Education Reform.  Would you be surprised to know that “26 percent of 8th grade students scored “below basic” on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading exam” or that “Despite more than doubling per-student expenditures, reading scores in U.S. schools have remained relatively flat”. 

 

 

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Public school funding for public school kids

The Jordan District has forgotten that it is the taxpayers money and not theirs… Jordan joins other school in objecting to pay for charter schools

By Ben Fulton

The Salt Lake Tribune

 

Salt Lake Tribune

Article Launched:10/29/2008 12:48:04 AM MDT

 

The Ogden School District voiced its displeasure. The Granite School District did the same.

    Now, after a unanimous vote Tuesday objecting to a state law requiring that Utah school districts help pay for charter schools, the Jordan School District brings to three the number of school district education boards protesting Senate Bill 2, also known as the omnibus education bill.

    Before passing the resolution J. Dale Christensen, board president, said its purpose was "to share our thoughts and feelings with interested parties." Other board members of the Jordan School District, however, took time to voice their disapproval of the law by stating they "strongly" support the resolution.

    "We are not the only ones objecting," said board member Peggy Jo Kennett, in reference to Ogden and Granite school districts' previous resolutions objecting to the new state law. "School districts are being hurt."

    Since their creation about 10 years ago in Utah, charter schools have boomed in popularity. Today they comprise 66 schools educating more than 27,000 students. If the state Board of Education approves of new expansion plans for charter schools, they could enroll almost 13,000 additional students in the 2010-11 school year.

    Charter schools operate under a specific mission unique to each school, and receive public funding from taxpayers. Unlike traditional public schools, however, their boards are not elected by the voting public. Because they have no geographic boundaries similar to public schools, charter schools cannot levy taxes like school boards representing traditional public schools.

    School districts note that when state lawmakers approved charter schools they promised the traditional public school system that it would not lose money to those new charter schools. However, state lawmakers have found themselves scrambling to cover charter school growth. A House Bill last legislative session proposing a transfer of money from traditional public schools to charter schools failed by 8 votes. When later wrapped into one omnibus bill with several other pieces of legislation affecting education, however, it passed.

    That the measure to transfer those funds to charter schools passed by what many view as legislative sleight-of-hand, coupled with the Legislature's earlier promise that traditional public school funding would remain untouched, has driven many Utah school boards' protest.

    Jordan's resolution objecting to the law is significant because it is being charged $735,311 to fund charter schools, the largest amount among all state school districts.

    "The state has effectively created a second level of funding for these schools," said Barry L. Newbold, Jordan School District superintendent. "It reflects a shifting of that responsibility."

    School District board members from the Ogden, Granite and Jordan districts have also noted that the law makes them responsible for raising property taxes to cover these new costs and accountable to the voting public. Individual charter school boards, by contrast, waive that pressure and responsibility.

    Charter school proponents, however, have said it's reasonable to expect that school districts pay money to charter schools because the traditional public school system would be educating children attending charter schools anyway if charter schools did not exist.

 

 

Monday, October 20, 2008

UEA and Accountability

Utah Education Association
Author rips testing, other sacred classroom concepts
By Lisa Schencker
The Salt Lake Tribune

Salt Lake Tribune
Article Last Updated:
Rising test scores are no reason to celebrate, author Alfie Kohn told teachers at the Utah Education Association (UEA) convention on Friday.
Schools that improve test scores do so at the expense of other subjects and ideas, he said.
"When the scores go up, it's not just meaningless. It's worrisome," Kohn told hundreds of educators on the last day of the convention. "What did you sacrifice from my child's education to raise scores on the test?"
Kohn, who's written 11 books on human behavior, parenting and schools, spent nearly two hours Friday morning ripping into both established and relatively new education concepts. He slammed merit pay for teachers, competition in schools, Advanced Placement classes, curriculum standards and testing - including Utah's standards and testing system - drawing mixed reactions from his audience.
"Considering what we hear a lot, it was pure blasphemy," said Richard Heath, a teacher at Central Davis Junior High School in Layton.
Kohn called merit pay - forms of which many Utah school districts are implementing this year - an "odious" type of control imposed on teachers.
"If you jump through hoops, we'll give you a doggie biscuit in the form of money," Kohn said.
He said competition in schools destroys their sense of community. Advanced Placement classes, he claimed, focus more on material but don't do much to deepen students' understanding. He said standardized tests are designed so that some students must always fail or they're considered too easy, and often the students who do poorly are members of minority groups.
"We are creating in this country before our eyes, little by little, what could be described as educational ethnic cleansing," Kohn said. He called Utah's standards too specific and the number of tests given to Utah students "mind-boggling."
He called on teachers to explain such problems to parents and community members.
"The best teachers spend every day of their lives strategically avoiding or subverting the Utah curriculum," Kohn said.
Many teachers said they agreed with much of Kohn's talk, but disagreed on some points.
Shauna Cooney, a second grade teacher at Majestic Elementary School in Ogden, said it's important to have standards that give all children equal opportunities to learn certain concepts before they move forward.
Sidni Jones, an elementary teacher mentor in the Davis School District, agreed that current standardized tests are not as meaningful as other types of assessment, but she said it is hard to fight the current system.
"You can't just openly rebel against standardized testing because they're mandated," Jones said. "That's part of our jobs."
Rep. Kory Holdaway, R-Taylorsville, who is also a special education teacher at Taylorsville High School, said he walked out of the speech.
"We have got to have some degree of accountability for the public," Holdaway said. "The public demands it. Sometimes we forget who our customers are in terms of children and families."
Others, however, largely agreed with Kohn.
"It was awesome," said Claudia Butter, a teacher at the Open Classroom charter school in Salt Lake City. "With little steps we might be able to effect a change."
UEA President Kim Campbell said the UEA doesn't necessarily agree with everything Kohn advocates, but chose him as the keynote speaker because of his thought-provoking ideas.
"We want our members to constantly be challenging themselves and be thinking about new ideas and what they're doing in the classroom," Campbell said.

Monday, June 30, 2008

State fertile ground for high-tech, but Utah execs warn of potential weakness

 

By Tom Harvey
The Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake Tribune

 

Article Last Updated:06/26/2008 07:24:02 AM MDT

Utah can boast one of the top environments for high-tech companies in the nation, two reports out this week show.
    Although both measured the conditions underlying the technology and science industries, and their vibrancy, executives at Utah companies warn that the long-term health of those sectors might be in danger because of weaknesses in math and science education.
    And they say that in Utah, as well as nationally, the nation's maddening, bureaucratic post-9/11 visa system is keeping out potentially valuable, highly skilled workers and prompting foreign students to study in other nations.
    A report by the Milken Institute placed Utah in the Top 10 among states in its Technology and Science Index, which the group says is "an inventory of the technology and science assets that can be leveraged to promote economic development."
    The report, which took into account population size and other factors, ranked states in five areas. Utah was No. 1 in technology concentration and dynamism, which measured the creation of technology companies and where they were clustering as an indication of where innovation will occur.
    "That says not only is the state doing well, but that high-tech is really growing in Utah," said Kevin Klowden, a managing economist at the Milken Institute.
    A September 2007 survey by the Utah Technology Council, a trade group, showed there were 5,200 high-tech and science companies in the state employing about 66,000 workers. The number of firms was up more 10 percent from the prior year, said Richard Nelson, president and CEO of the group.
    Utah has entered into a second stage in its high-tech industry evolution after the giants of the early '80s such as WordPerfect, Novell and Iomega left or evolved into different companies, said Darren Lee, president and CEO of NextPage, a Draper software company.
    "What I've noticed the past few years is that we have a lot of really promising companies that are sort of in that early revenue stage, up to that $50 million a year stage . . . but a greater breadth of those than we've seen before have much stronger chance of being viable and stand-alone companies," he said.
    Nelson pointed to the state's creation of several programs that provide funding and other help to foster entrepreneurship as leading factors in creating a vibrant technology industry in Utah.
    Those include the Utah Fund of Funds, a $300 million state program providing capital to entrepreneurs, and USTAR (the Utah Science Technology and Research initiative), a state-funded program that invests in research through funding and recruiting top researchers at the University of Utah and Utah State University.
    Terry Pitts, a founder and CEO of the Orem software company DigitalBridge, also cited the area's lower cost of living, compared with such high-tech hotbeds as California, its outdoor activities and the number of days of sunshine as additional attractions for high-tech companies.
    A second report out this week, from AeA, the nation's largest technology trade association, said the Salt Lake City area added 2,300 high-tech jobs in 2006, the latest year for its data. That ranked the area as having the third-fastest growth rate among 60 cities. Those jobs paid $59,600, about 55 percent more than the average private-sector wage, the report said.
    But as bright as the present looks for Utah's technology industry, the future remains clouded by state and national weaknesses in producing or attracting a sufficient number of engineers and scientists.
    Nelson cited another 2007 UTC survey of 40 companies, which showed nearly 11 percent of their engineering and science positions were open. He called the quality of Utah's work force its "number one economic development issue." The state is suffering from a "lack of rigor" in its kindergarten through 12th-grade math and science programs, which aren't moving enough students into college and toward graduating as engineers or scientists, he said.
    "Now the critical issue is, how do we continue to fuel Utah's high-growth com- panies."
    Lee, the NextPage CEO, also pointed to the nation's visa system, which he said is keeping out the students and highly qualified engineers and scientists who are needed to support the nation's high-tech economy.
    "That's a national problem but it has implications here," he said.

tharvey@sltrib.com

Blog Archive